Freedom to choose

This week both HP and Dell reported significantly weak PC sales. While Meg Whitman asserted that the PC was not dead, the most alive aspect in the market featured smartphones and tablets.  A quick perusal of the landscape reveals even more signs of mobility moving from a trend to a certainty.  Yesterday PayPal and Discover announced a partnership that ups the ante on the Starbucks and Square news earlier this month and adds to the momentum building for mobile payments. Three months ago, Mary Meeker presented her analysis of the Internet at the D: All Things Digital conference ion California. While her presentation in its entirety is well worth the strong impact it continues to make, one particular slide really hit home (see below). For years people have talked about working from home versus working from the office. But the mobility tsunami is so much more than that.  We are rapidly approaching the point where we can choose to work, learn, play connect or do from where we want to be, not where we have to be. And as we become increasingly untethered, a chosen place will need to be much more than its simple physicality to be highly valued by its occupants.

update: One more note of mobility challenging previous practice – Facebook and ads

Goodbye to being tethered?

An attic for everyone

Data and information are swamping us.  So what – that’s old news, you say. But if you’re on the data service providing end at a college or university, you are only too aware of the insatiable storage demands of your clientele. The cause is simple – the handy, obvious physical restraints of the past are gone. Remember file cabinets stuffed from front to back and books piled on the floor when the shelves were filled? With the exception of true hoarders, we determined what to keep and what to discard on a rolling basis over time.

The digital world entices us with freedom from physical constraints. Much like Groundhog Day, our digital lives unfold in an endless pattern of create, acquire and save that occurs without deterrents. The cost of choosing what to keep and what to trash is much too high – it requires what is now most rare – our focused attention. So we never actually delete.  We might curate, but that only brings some things into focus; the others remain waiting in the background. Editing happens with revision histories, not wadded papers discarded in the bin. Emails marked as read continue scrolling downward into a deepening well of messages. Meanwhile your local data center struggles to satisfy the insatiable demand for storage.

Amazon announced Glacier today offering 1 GB for 1 penny per month. Lease as much as you need for a very low price. The catch – it is named appropriately. It is archive storage. If you want to retrieve something, plan on it taking hours rather than minutes.  But this seems to be a reasonable decision point that all of us could make as we confront our data – put it into the attic or leave it out in the room.

MTV Algebra and Lifetime History

In the eighties, publishers and media companies talked incessantly about synergy among their various products. Disney was (and remains) a master – movies begat toys and amusement rides while amusement rides begat movies, costumes, more toys and books.  Creating content was expensive and profits were much better when that content could be re-purposed in as many ways for as many potential audiences as possible. But throughout that period and until lately, such efforts focused on the trade and consumer markets. Now the New York Times alerts us to developments in the latest hot market for media companies – the K-12 classroom.

The textbook is becoming the Techbook according to the Discovery Channel.  Yes, the cable regular (and News Corp) is moving beyond streaming video to creating a variety of highly interactive texts designed to engage students and expand market share. Reporters Brooks Barnes and Amy Chozick tell us that given the declining revenues of media companies, “Education is emerging as an answer, largely because executives see a way to capitalize on the changes that technology is bringing to classrooms — turnabout as fair play, given the way that the Web has upended major media’s own business models.”

Every year at this time, many college and university campuses come to life after a fairly dormant summer. Hundreds, and in some places thousands, of new first years or frosh begin their journey toward a baccalaureate degree. Increasingly those students will arrive having experienced years of a digitally-enhanced (or at least infused) educational experience that will no longer be evident once they matriculate to higher learning. The disconnect between cable channel versions of a high school textbook and one that has been authored by a faculty member for a university seminar is going to loom very large indeed.

Algorithms, robots and us

News these days is cause more for reflection than reaction. A read of the Sunday NYT about the latest generation of factory robots leads to pondering a rapid transformation of the workforce that makes earlier changes in agribusiness look like a slow stroll. The message that “With these machines, we can make any consumer device in the world” reveals a future where outsourcing labor is no longer a geopolitical issue, but one where the planet tries to support millions of low-skilled human workers whose marketplace value is quickly disappearing. John Markoff, writer of this piece makes this sobering point near the end of the piece “Some jobs are still beyond the reach of automation….but that list is growing shorter.”

But automation is not only the world of robots on the factory floor. In a piece in the WSJ, Christopher Steiner previews his book that describes the ever-growing presence of “bots” or algorithms in the world of creative and analytical judgement. From choosing songs and move scripts with a high probability of success to grading written essays, he explains “The more we understand about creativity, the more we are able to distill it into the language of algorithms—the “brains” behind computer programs”.

So much of reaction pits one against the other – the age-old human vs machine. But reflection about the tales in these two stories also engenders ideas about the increasing interconnected meshiness of humans and digital acting in the world together. And that is really worth much more thought.

 

Sourcing patterns

Earlier this week, the Internet was quivering with a “discovered” news story about Apple’s new proprietary screw that would make it difficult for anyone without a special tool to pry open the case of a product. So what’s the problem?  The story didn’t have even a shred of truth. A company in Sweden merely posted an image as bait and watched with amusement as the reporters, pundits and fans created a writhing mass of information sharing.

The rush to be first to report isn’t unique to the Internet. Neither is error created through failure to adequately and correctly confirm through sources. Recall the famous Woodward and Bernstein gaffe about Haldeman and GOP re-election funds. Both examples however, also illustrate the fascinating pattern-matching abilities we have. The account of being duped by the purported Apple screw image in ReadWrite Web shows how easily we filter information based on the assumptions that we already have. That is what the Internet makes so incredibly simple for everyone – surrounding us with so much that our pattern-matching remains on high alert for those aha! moments when what we think we know is confirmed.

Teaching students the difference between peer-reviewed and popular information simply isn’t enough. While many tout the value of information literacy, and it is a path to apprehending this world, much of the focus is on examining the characteristics of the information as a way to determine its authority. But perhaps just as important is focusing on cognitive self awareness and the patterned assumptions that instantly make some bit of information appear a bit brighter, a bit more interesting in the turbulent sea of data in which we swim.

To Do Redux

How many to do list makers, reminders, etc. apps are there?  Probably hundreds. And I will report that I have yet to find one that makes getting all of those things accomplished any easier.  But just as Apple moves Reminders to all of its platforms, Clear arrives. The user interface is a smart, creative use of touch UI and the functionality of the app. The swipe closing on a task accomplished might be just the motivation you’ve been looking for.

Books and DNA

It happens more quickly now. The it is an observation, conversation, published research, tweet, chance encounter that reveals yet another way that zeros and ones, the binary digital world, reveals itself changing our expectations. Yesterday afternoon it was the revelation of a library in a test tube. Thank you Watson and Crick.

The laboratory as a library?

And this wasn’t a trip into sci-fi literature. It was the Wall Street Journal – yes, the authoritative source of all news financial and not especially prone to flights of fancy other than an occasional gush over an impending IPO. With the low-key, but significant headline of Future of Data:Encoded in DNA, a story describes the successful efforts of a Harvard research team to translate a book on genomic engineering into actual DNA. The book would have required the digital space of a 3.5 inch floppy disk (if you immediately visualize this, realize that you are old), but instead fit comfortably into a small laboratory vial. After encoding the book into DNA, the words, illustrations and computer code all reducible to zeros and ones, the researchers read it back into a digital format ready for a print publisher.